I want to experiment safely
Use an isolated environment with controlled model access, data boundaries, logging, guidance and usage limits.
Safe, measurable AI experimentation
The AI Sandbox creates a separated environment for one defined application. Test data, model access, costs, quality and human review are controlled so you can decide to stop, adjust, extend or implement with evidence.
Two routes
Use an isolated environment with controlled model access, data boundaries, logging, guidance and usage limits.
We define the use case, prepare data, build the prototype, create an evaluation set and assess technical feasibility.
Example experiments
These are proposed architectures and intended results. A sandbox demonstrates what actually works with your constraints and data.
AI Sandbox
Test referenced answers across technical sources with access controls and an explicit fallback when evidence is insufficient.
View use case → 02AI Sandbox
Test structured summaries of decisions, obligations and differences with links to supporting passages.
View use case → 03AI Sandbox
Test proposed actions, owners and deadlines from meeting transcripts before anything is registered or sent.
View use case →Protected by design
Business data and personal data
Model and user access
Network connections and external APIs
Secrets and credentials
Experiment logs
Usage and budget
Test behavior from production processes
Deletion and retention
What you provide
The task or decision the experiment should support
Representative, permitted test data
Current process and baseline examples
Known risks, policies and access restrictions
People who can judge output quality
Systems that may be integrated after validation
What you receive
Defined test hypothesis
Selected use case
Relevant data-source inventory
Secured test environment
Working prototype
Tested model configurations
Evaluation set
Baseline of the current process
Quality and reliability scores
Logging and human-control design
Production architecture sketch
Decision to stop, adjust, test longer, extend or implement
Guardrails
People, models and services receive only the access needed for the test.
Use representative test data and minimise or mask personal and sensitive information.
The sandbox does not send messages, change records or make production decisions without approval.
Logging, budgets, usage limits and deletion procedures make the experiment manageable.
Approach
Step 1
Set the task, boundaries, baseline, evaluation examples and stopping criteria.
Step 2
Prepare the separated environment, prototype and repeatable quality evaluation.
Step 3
Assess quality, risk, operating cost and the architecture required for responsible production use.
Reliability and limitations
Model output can remain incomplete, inconsistent or wrong.
Quality must be measured against representative examples.
Sensitive data should be minimised and governed throughout the test.
Production access, monitoring, support and incident handling require a separate design.
Stopping without further investment is a valid sandbox outcome.
No. Start with the smallest representative and permitted dataset that can test the hypothesis. Sensitive information can often be removed, masked or replaced.
Not automatically. The sandbox identifies what works and which architecture, controls, integrations and management are still required for production.
Usually several model or configuration options can be compared, provided they fit the data, security and budget boundaries.
That is useful evidence. The decision may be to adjust the task, improve data, choose deterministic automation or stop without a larger implementation.
Describe the task, available test material and the risk you need to control. We will determine whether an AI Sandbox is the right next step.