AI Mini Scan

Enrich product data without inventing product facts

Descriptions, specifications and classifications are incomplete or inconsistent across systems. A scan identifies which gaps can be resolved from trusted information and which still require editorial or supplier input.

Intended result
More complete and consistent product records with an editorial approval step.
Human approval
Required
Integration
Likely

01

Situation

Descriptions, specifications and classifications are incomplete or inconsistent across systems. A scan identifies which gaps can be resolved from trusted information and which still require editorial or supplier input.

02

Current problem

Teams manually compare supplier files, catalogue records and descriptions to fill recurring gaps.

03

Desired change

The workflow proposes normalized attributes, classifications and descriptions with source evidence.

04

Possible workflow

  1. Compare

    Identify missing or inconsistent fields

    Evaluate records against required attributes and category rules.

  2. Propose

    Generate structured changes

    Use trusted supplier data, validation rules and controlled language generation.

  3. Publish

    Review before updating systems

    Approve or reject each proposal before changing the catalogue or webshop.

05

Human control

Editors verify factual accuracy, tone, category fit and publication readiness.

06

Technology and data

Product sources
PIM, ERP, supplier feeds and approved product documentation.
Validation
Required fields, formats, vocabularies and category-specific rules.
Editorial assistance
Language generation constrained by verified facts and brand guidance.

07

Boundaries

  • Every proposed fact needs an attributable source.
  • Conflicting supplier data requires a resolution owner.
  • Category and channel rules must be explicit.
  • Editors approve changes before publication.
  • Generated facts require a trusted source
  • Category rules differ across catalogues
  • Publication must remain controlled